Today's most viewed
Sentence cut for soldier who stole explosives
A SERVING soldier who stole explosives from the
Royal Artillery to use in private war games has won a cut in his jail term at London's Court of Appeal.
But the halving of his sentence may not be enough
to save 26-year-old Adam Pearce's career, after top judges refused to suspend his custodial terms.
Pearce, of Heath Square, Larkhill, Wilts, pleaded guilty to theft and having an explosive substance at Salisbury Crown Court, and was jailed for a total of two years in May. His lawyers told
Mr Justice Irwin and Mr Justice Coulson a custodial sentence means an end to an Army career, and attacked the sentence as "manifestly
excessive".
The judges agreed the Lance Bombardier's jail term
was too long, reducing it to 12 months, but said the offence was so serious it could only be met by custody.
Pearce had stolen flares, smoke grenades, rounds for use in a self-propelling gun, and artillery designed to be used in a Howitzer - as well as manufacturing a grenade - and storing them in his
married quarters in a cupboard under the stairs.
He told police he had been careful to ensure they were stored safely, but Mr Justice Irwin said they could have caused serious injury, or even
death, if accidentally triggered by, for example, a house fire.
Pearce also said he had taken the items for use in
Airsoft, a more sophisticated version of paintballing.
The judge added Pearce, who said he found the items when he was walking on
Army grounds while off duty, was in something of an unstable state when arrested in December 2006.
Police attended his house following a row with his wife, and Pearce was taken to hospital after overdosing on painkillers.
When his wife showed police the armoury, the bomb
squad had to be called in.
Mr Justice Irwin said Pearce had shown
"considerable achievement" while in the Army, and had completed a tour of duty in Afghanistan during his nine-year career in the
services.
The court also received character references from his commanding officers, and Mr Justice Irwin said the sentence was "too severe" - but 12 months was the most lenient punishment the court
could impose.
He added it was up to the Army - which does not want to dismiss him as a soldier - whether it bends the rules for Pearce and allows him to
resume his career when he has finally served his
11:15am Thursday 17th July 2008
Print 
Email this
CommentPosted by: Mike Parslow, Fordingbridge on 4:49pm Thu 17 Jul 08
Can someone in the Army please explain the difference between this man and a terrorist?
He steal armaments and stores them at home, and they want him back???
Can someone in the Army please explain the difference between this man and a terrorist?
He steal armaments and stores them at home, and they want him back???
Posted by: Michael29cd, salisbury on 8:52pm Thu 17 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Mike Parslow[/bold] wrote:
Can someone in the Army please explain the difference between this man and a terrorist?
He steal armaments and stores them at home, and they want him back???[/quote] [bold]The difference between terrorist and this man is he wasn't going to use it to blow up tube station or a airport he was going to use them in a air soft game and he must have got into such state of mind that he thought it was ok to take some of this stuff...and if hes still fit enough to go back in the army he should be allowed back in and when he does i bet he will have no access to the arms & explosives warehouse.[/bold]
Mike Parslow wrote:
Can someone in the Army please explain the difference between this man and a terrorist?
He steal armaments and stores them at home, and they want him back???
The difference between terrorist and this man is he wasn't going to use it to blow up tube station or a airport he was going to use them in a air soft game and he must have got into such state of mind that he thought it was ok to take some of this stuff...and if hes still fit enough to go back in the army he should be allowed back in and when he does i bet he will have no access to the arms & explosives warehouse.
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!