Druid bid to have remains re-buried fails

King Arthur Pendragon and his followers

King Arthur Pendragon and his followers

First published in News by

A DRUID leader has lost his High Court bidto force the re-interment of ancient bones dug up by archaeologists at Stonehenge.

King Arthur Pendragon, the Titular Head and Chosen Chief of the Loyal Arthurian Warband Druid Order, wants the cremated remains of more than 40 bodies, thought to be at least 5,000 years old, removed from a burial site at the ancient stone circle five years ago, put back in the ground.

Mr Pendragon, of St Lawrence Close, Stratford-sub-Castle, says it is an offence to the Pagan religion for the Government to have permitted the remains of those Druids call The Guardians to have been dug up for display.

He claims the bones were the remains of members of the "royal line" or "priest caste" who could have been the "founding fathers of this great nation."

In 2011, King Arthur lost a previous High Court bid to have bones, unearthed in 2008, reburied. On Wednesday, Mr Justice Ouseley at London's High Court heard his application for a judicial review of the decision.

Mr Pendragon complained of "duplicity" by government officials, who he says promised the bones would be returned to the soil. He showed the court an email from a government official promising that, "the religious views of Pagans and Druids will be respected and the remains re-interred."

He told the judge: "The general public and groups I represent feel that, because of the ramifications of this duplicity, judicial review is wholly appropriate and desirable."

English Heritage said in their reply that "not all Pagans and Druids want the bones re-interred" and the Government's decision was the correct.

After a brief hearing, Mr Justice Ousely blocked the Druid case at the first hurdle, refusing Mr Pendragon permission to mount a full judicial review challenge.

However, Mr Pendragon said he could "not rule out non-violent direct action against the proposals”, should his fight in the courts fail.

In a statement after the hearing, an English Heritage spokesman said that Mr Pendragon's case concerned human remains excavated by Professor Mike Parker Pearson from one of the Aubrey Holes at Stonehenge in 2008, which are not due to be displayed at the new visitor centre when it opens this December.

Three other sets of ancient remains are due to go on public display at the visitor centre, which is also opposed by Mr Pendragon and his followers.

The spokesman said: "We believe the three sets of human remains have a rightful place in the exhibition. Real objects and primary evidence are what museums and archaeological exhibitions are about, and there is no substitute for people getting close to history.”

"The presentation, treatment and storage of the human remains will follow strict guidelines set out by the UK government’s Department of Culture, Media and Sport.”

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:02pm Fri 17 May 13

alysraven says...

Throughout man's time on Earth, funerary practices have been carried out, and the expectation would have been that they remained at peace. In fact, most cultures went to great lengths to make sure that was so.
English Heritage could have been trailblazers and chosen to display models at their new visitor centre. Not every prospective visitor will fell comfortable in viewing real human remains, so why should they be excluded from the entire "Stonehenge Experience" on offer?
Throughout man's time on Earth, funerary practices have been carried out, and the expectation would have been that they remained at peace. In fact, most cultures went to great lengths to make sure that was so. English Heritage could have been trailblazers and chosen to display models at their new visitor centre. Not every prospective visitor will fell comfortable in viewing real human remains, so why should they be excluded from the entire "Stonehenge Experience" on offer? alysraven
  • Score: 0

9:51pm Sat 18 May 13

PaganFred says...

Mr. Pendragon DOES NOT speak for all pagans. I am a practicing witch and though I disagree that these skeletons should be placed on public display, I completely understand and acknowledge the importance of their archaeological data--further with the state of the world as it is, their very safety from relic hunters on eBay means they are safer in a vault with English Heritage.

I did want to state for the record that I truly am appalled at the way the Druid faith chooses to dictate what is and what isn't acceptable to all paths of the natural religions. Simply because they have been able to bully their way into Stonehenge and certain newspapers does not mean they hold sway in what I believe is right or wrong.

Therefore, do as you believe Mr. Pendragon, but leave the general pagan out of your demands and decisions. We chose our faith due to our unique and individual ways of faith and for you to take it upon yourself to speak for us makes you look the fool.
Mr. Pendragon DOES NOT speak for all pagans. I am a practicing witch and though I disagree that these skeletons should be placed on public display, I completely understand and acknowledge the importance of their archaeological data--further with the state of the world as it is, their very safety from relic hunters on eBay means they are safer in a vault with English Heritage. I did want to state for the record that I truly am appalled at the way the Druid faith chooses to dictate what is and what isn't acceptable to all paths of the natural religions. Simply because they have been able to bully their way into Stonehenge and certain newspapers does not mean they hold sway in what I believe is right or wrong. Therefore, do as you believe Mr. Pendragon, but leave the general pagan out of your demands and decisions. We chose our faith due to our unique and individual ways of faith and for you to take it upon yourself to speak for us makes you look the fool. PaganFred
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree