Crow Lane development approved

PLANS to build up to 175 homes on a greenfield site in the New Forest have been given the go-ahead by planners.

New Forest District Council has approved a multi-million-pound plan to redevelop land at Crow Lane, Ringwood, despite receiving more than 130 objections.

The scheme, which includes light industry provision, a hotel and a nursing home, could create as many as 260 jobs.

But people living near the site say it will increase traffic problems, including on the A31, as well as increase the flood risk.

The scheme, by Linden Homes and Hampshire County Council, was approved by a margin of just two votes by the district council’s planning committee.

During a long debate, several members called for the application to be deferred pending further examination of the proposals and objections.

Ringwood councillor Michael Thierry cited what he called “alarming gaps” in the report presented to the committee.

He added: “There are sound, sensible reasons for a deferral.

“It would encourage the applicants to look again at what they’re proposing and hopefully come back with a revised scheme that’s acceptable.”

Cllr Maureen Holding added: “There’s a lot about this that I don’t like. Linden is a very good firm and I think they’ll get there in the end, but I don’t believe we can approve something as open-ended as this.”

Cllr Jeremy Heron, who also represents Ringwood, dismissed assurances given by highway experts.

He told the committee: “Every single resident down there knows that what these people are saying is complete nonsense. This is going to create huge amounts of traffic.”

But planning officer Chris Elliott said proposed improvements to junctions in the area would mean the roads could cope with extra vehicles.

Commenting on an objection by the New Forest National Park Authority he said the number of people driving across the national park to the proposed development would be “minimal”.

Planning consultant Bob Sellwood, representing the applicants, stressed that half the homes would be social housing.

The scheme was approved by eight votes to six.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:23pm Tue 15 Apr 14

Rick White says...

So Chris Elliott stated that improvements to junctions resolves the other issues regarding the fact that the proposed site is only accessed by 'lanes'. Eastfield Lane, Crowe Lane and Crowe Arch Lane, none of which is suitable for the amount of traffic that this will produce.
I would ask him to obtain the traffic report that the owners of the old Welworthy site commissioned some 5 or 6 years ago that clearly stated that the junction of Castleman Way and Christchurch Road was running at capacity, at certain times of the day, when they carried out said study! This particular junction will be one of two roads used to gain access to the A31.
These people, the planners, are less connected with the real world and seem devoid of common sense as if their computer 'modelling' says it will work then it must be right.
I was under the impression from central government, that they were wanting a 'big society' where local people got involved with the decisions that effect them. This appears not to be the case in this instance! Democracy has died and no matter that there is consultation, it is merely a means to placate the masses, with no thought whatsoever of taking any comments into account.
So Chris Elliott stated that improvements to junctions resolves the other issues regarding the fact that the proposed site is only accessed by 'lanes'. Eastfield Lane, Crowe Lane and Crowe Arch Lane, none of which is suitable for the amount of traffic that this will produce. I would ask him to obtain the traffic report that the owners of the old Welworthy site commissioned some 5 or 6 years ago that clearly stated that the junction of Castleman Way and Christchurch Road was running at capacity, at certain times of the day, when they carried out said study! This particular junction will be one of two roads used to gain access to the A31. These people, the planners, are less connected with the real world and seem devoid of common sense as if their computer 'modelling' says it will work then it must be right. I was under the impression from central government, that they were wanting a 'big society' where local people got involved with the decisions that effect them. This appears not to be the case in this instance! Democracy has died and no matter that there is consultation, it is merely a means to placate the masses, with no thought whatsoever of taking any comments into account. Rick White
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree