News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Fury at hike in swimming charges

FURIOUS swimmers have slammed Five Rivers Leisure Centre after the cost of taking a child swimming rocketed by 57 per cent overnight.

It now costs £4.15 for a child to swim at the Wiltshire Council run pool - last week it was £2.65 and until last October it was free. Adult swimming sessions have shot up by 43 per cent from £4 to £5.70.

It could work out cheaper for Salisbury swimmers to drive their families to pools in Andover, where swimming is £3.40 for adults and £2.30 for children, or Ringwood where adults pay £3.65 and under eights swim for free.

One way for Salisbury residents to get cheaper swimming sessions is to pay £11 a year for Wiltshire Council’s new leisure card.

However, the council admits it has failed to market the scheme properly and hundreds of people paid the new prices to use the pool this week, unaware they could be saving money and without being informed of the option by centre staff.

In its literature, the council says the leisure card saves about 15 per cent on leisure centre charges, so many people haven’t signed up, thinking it isn’t worth their while.

In reality, the leisure card means users, including children, pay £1.50 less each time they swim - a saving closer toa quarter of the full price.

But each member of a family, adults or children over the age of three, must have their own card.

Prices of court hire, gym use and other sports have also soared and people will need to buy a leisure card to bring the cost down to around its previous level.

“It’s outrageous,” said keen swimmer Sophie Dalboozi, who was stunned at the cost of taking her six-year-old daughter Mya swimming on Friday.

“They were just taking the money - I didn’t know I’d have to get one of these leisure cards.

“I don’t know how they can justify charging £11 for one anyway. The pool is very poor, often the flume is shut because there’s not enough staff.

“They are supposed to be encouraging children to live active lifestyles but people won’t be able to afford to go at those prices.

“There’s not much else for children to do in Salisbury that is affordable. If the council can’t offer a good, value for money service they should sell it off to a private company that knows what it’s doing.”

Fellow swimmer Nikki Macey said: “I was astonished to find out the price for a child has nearly doubled. How on earth can Wiltshire Council justify so much of an increase, especially as the pool is nothing special? Other towns provide great leisure complexes with ice skating, bowling, soft play areas, swimming pools with decent flumes and the entrance fee still manages to be cheaper than our pool.”

Robin Townsend, head of leisure services at Wiltshire Council, said: “We would like to apologise for any confusion caused by the introduction of our new leisure card.

“The cards offer large discounts on services at our leisure centres in the south and east of the county, and I would encourage people to contact their local centre to find out more.”

Have Your Say

Is swimming at Five Rivers too expensive?

Phone 'Yes' - 09011 510 479

Phone 'No' - 09011 510 480

By text - send your text to 80360 starting with SWIM, leave a space, then type either Yes or No.

Calls cost no more than 51p per call from a BT landline. Calls from mobiles and some other networks may cost more. Texts cost 50p plus your normal operator text charge. Telephone and text voting lines close at midnight on 12/04/11. For full terms go to www.newsquest.co.uk/terms. Service provided by Newsquest Media Group.

Comments(6)

Chris Ayriss says...
6:21am Fri 8 Apr 11

Perhaps its time to try wild swimming! At Farleigh and District Swimming Club, family's can enjoy wild swimming at a fraction of the costs. Membership is compulsory but it costs just £10.00 for adults and £5.00 for children. Less than the cost of a leisure pass in Salisbury!
http://www.stowfordm
anorfarm.co.uk/swimm
ing.php
http://hungouttodry.
co.uk

KarinMuir says...
3:01pm Fri 8 Apr 11

I think it is outrageous they are charging so much. I would text the poll line, but I am not going to pay the 50p + to do so. For us as a family of 5 it would cost £24.15, however if we were to drive to Romsey Rapids, it would cost just £16.80 and that is for a lot more facilities. The price of swimming needs to go back to what it was, or even better, be free again.

Grampie says...
2:53pm Sun 10 Apr 11

Public swimming pools were built so that our children did not drown or catch disease in the rivers.

My daughter with my five year old grandaughter had to pay £9.85 for what was the use of the pool for an hour.

As the article said, in October it was free swimming for children and old Grampies.

This is where current Conservative policies hit the weakest and vulnerable most.
Fewer youngsters will go to the pool, their parents will not be able to afford it. Older ones will hang around on the streets, possibly getting into trouble and putting the police under pressure. Younger ones will stay indoors playing with their electronic games, getting fatter, instead of fitter.

We have a Conservative MP who supports the Conservative led Government who have made cut backs that affect the most vulnerable and a Conservative County Council who fix the fees for this the most social form of exercise for children.

Please don't reply about comments about a deficit. My five year old had nothing to do with antics of the British bankers in the USA who the Conservatives backed to the hilt until it all went wrong. She should not be penalised.

Same old Tories, make the poor pay, give tax breaks to the rich (Prediction-Income tax will be reduced just before the next election which will not benefit those who don't pay income tax)

AuraTodd says...
4:11pm Mon 11 Apr 11

Once again people will be going elsewhere to find their leisure facilities, EG shopping and sports activities.

One article said that people are not spending their money in Salisbury any more, and prefer Bournemouth or Basingstoke. Soon it will be the same for leisure centre's.

One day when Salisbury is a ghost town, I'll tell my grandchildren how Salisbury just died. How the city used to be thriving, now the streets are just empty and quiet.

There is nothing for children to do. Not much of a night-life, unless your into pubs and nightclubs. All seems to be centred round the cathedral and close.

Andrea534 says...
3:50pm Wed 13 Apr 11

@Grampie
Thanks to the Conservative led government a lot of the poorest have been lifted out of income tax altogether because the government has already reduced income tax for those at the bottom. Labour have done nothing to help the poorest, they looked the other way for a decade whilst the bankers lined their own pockets leaving us mere mortals to pick up the bill. Thanks to Labour’s mismanagement your five year old already owes £23,000, we all do. It is disgusting. I will make a comment about a deficit… it is there, it is real, it threatens this country with bankruptcy. I do not like everything the government is doing but I respect it for having the balls to make the impossible decisions required to deal with our financial crisis that Labour continues to shirk away from.

Grampie says...
9:32pm Wed 13 Apr 11

Hello Andrea.

Stick with this, it is a bit long winded.

I think there are some things you are not aware of regarding the nation’s finances.
What you omitted to say was the Conservatives in opposition wanted the Labour Government to relax the rules governing banking. Cameron said he was going to continue to spend as much on the economy as labour until the WORLD WIDE financial crisis hit the world.
The conservatives wanted to let bankrupt banks go to the wall. If the labour Government had done that, millions of people would have lost their savings and thousands of small businesses would have gone to the wall, that is why they had to bail them out, that is why we have such a large deficit.

We had our manufacturing industry decline because of globalisation and we were left with the financial industries as our main source of income.

The rules regulating the financial industry were relaxed by those old socialists, a Mrs M Thatcher, together with Mr R Reagan.

The labour government was wrong not to tighten up the banking rules, but you can bet your life that the Conservatives would have howled like mad if they did.
The previous Labour government recognised there was a problem and had already taken steps to reduce public spending, much of which came into being in the beginning of last year. In addition, their plan was to cut spending at a much slower rate than these Conservatives are doing. That is prudent.

As for your comments about what has the labour party done for poor people, How about the following old chestnuts:
Set up the NHS (The Conservatives hated that and still do)
The Welfare state (Atlee’s Government in 1945) Child benefit etc.
Winter fuel allowances for pensioners (The Conservatives have cut my winter fuel allowance, whilst I can afford it, there are many who can’t)

The minimum wage (The Conservatives always opposed that

Free bus passes for pensioners (The Conservatives always opposed that)

Free swimming passes for children and older people (The Conservatives took that away

Child credit-(The Conservatives have taken £40 a month away from my hard working, tax-paying daughter

The Conservatives put up VAT to 20% which every non tax-paying person (Poor people usually) has to pay if they wish to buy things.

When the last labour Government were in power:

A million pensioners were lifted out of poverty

600,000 children were lifted out of relative poverty

It was the Conservative governments who threw away the North Sea Oil profits by cutting income tax for the rich and they let schools, hospitals, social housing and other public buildings rot.

It was on improving the lot of those less advantaged that the Labour Government did, because they had to due to the neglect of the previous Conservative Governments.

It was the Labour governments who re-built schools and hospitals, not Conservatives.

The Conservative loving banking industry got their noses in the troughs through the PFI initiatives, one such company with an office in Jersey, I believe, made £30 million last year for lending on PFI and only paid £100,000 in tax. One of the big mistakes the Labour party fell for.
Incidentally PFI was first used by the Conservative government led by John Major.

Why should Conservatives worry about the poor when they can send their money abroad as tax avoidance?

With regard to your comment about my grandchildren owing £23,000 you have swallowed the line that the credit card if overdrawn. On a grand scale of things, this debt is manageable (I don’t know too much about this, but I understand that most of the debt is to financial institutions in this country).
Our situation is different to those of Ireland ( an article by the then shadow chancellor George Osborne written in 2006 is interesting http://www.timesonli
ne.co.uk/tol/comment
/columnists/guest_co
ntributors/article73
3821.ece copy and cut and put in your browser ) as is the situation in Greece and Portugal.

Many of the cuts and the re-organisation of the NHS are politically driven by the Conservatives.

I hope that as a result of those cuts, you are not made redundant or your children are unemployed or your grandmother suffers because she feels cannot afford the price of heating because the price has gone up and the Conservative Government has cut her winter fuel payments.

A few years ago I was talking to a gardener/handyman who worked for a wealthy, but retired businessman from the tobacco trade. The gardener told me that he was working in his employers garden, when the boss came out and told him with a smile on his face “The Conservative Chancellor has raised the personal allowance so you will be better off” The gardener told him “You don’t pay enough for me to pay tax now”. That was how much the rich employer knew about his employee.

I am afraid the Conservatives don’t do or care much about the poor. They never mention what they would do about poverty. Now that is disgusting.

Yours, Ian

click2find

Most popular