Concerns expressed over GP emails

Doctors who email patients instead of meeting with them in person or telephoning them could miss out on vital signs, it has been claimed.

Doctors who email patients instead of meeting with them in person or telephoning them could miss out on vital signs, it has been claimed.

First published in National Sport © by

Doctors who email patients instead of meeting with them in person or telephoning them could miss out on vital signs about a patient's ailments, according to an article in a leading medical journal.

The Department of Health has ploughed millions into pilot schemes assessing the effectiveness of e-consultations - such as over Skype or email.

But some medics have raised concerns about the prospect of emailing patients.

In an article published on thebmj.com, Emma Richards, academic GP registrar and honorary clinical research fellow at Imperial College London said that as well as the possibility of doctors missing out on emotional and clinical clues from patients, email communication could isolate elderly or poor patients who do not have access to the internet.

She argued that misunderstandings through emails could lead to blunders.

Meanwhile patients could become seriously unwell while waiting for an email to be answered, she said.

Dr Richards wrote that there is "no clear evidence" that that email communication improves access or saves money and that doctors were concerned that responding to emails would divert resources away from face-to-face consultations.

"Consultations using telephone or email share many characteristics, but telephone consultations offer emotional cues, such as tone of voice, as well as clinical clues, such as a wheeze," she wrote.

"Telephone facilitates two-way discussion in real time, to gather information, ask and answer questions, and check understanding. None of this can be done with a single email.

"Those in the greatest need of healthcare, such as elderly or infirm patients, may struggle to engage with email because of a lack of facilities or knowhow. Similar barriers exist for ethnic minorities and poor people, potentially creating a 'digital divide' of widening health inequalities."

She added: "The idea that patients can email unlimited requests and questions fills many GPs with dread -not only in terms of time but also clinical safety. Without immediate triage, what happens to the suicidal patient who sends an email on Friday night that goes unread until Monday, or the patient with chest pain who thinks she's dealt with the problem because she has emailed her doctor, who is on holiday?"

Dr Richards concluded: "Given the complexities of using email and understandable caution among GPs, it seems premature to be insisting that patients can have email communication with GPs. The Department of Health should first issue clear guidance on what can safely and appropriately be communicated by email and what resources are needed."

But arguing in favour of the move, Elinor Gunning, a locum family doctor in London and a clinical teaching fellow at University College London Medical School, said that email communication has the potential to improve convenience and efficiency for both patients and clinicians.

She said that well planned email services can provide an effective way of managing those with routine conditions.

It can also promote the doctor patient relationship though continuity of care, she argued.

While she admitted that some groups would be unable to use the method of communication she said it will be beneficial to others.

"Email services might facilitate access for those patients less able to use traditional methods of communication , such as housebound patients, those with hearing difficulties or younger patients who may be more likely to engage with this modern approach," wrote Dr Gunning.

"Admittedly some patient groups will be unable to benefit from email services. However, this is not a reason to deny this form of access to other patients."

She added: " The flavour of current UK health policy suggests that email use will soon be inevitable. If we do not engage with email now, implementation without our input may mean that GPs miss out on a vital opportunity to shape it's use, to the detriment of patients and clinicians."

An NHS England spokesman said: "There is real potential to make better use of technology like email and Skype in healthcare and there are many examples where it is already being used to good effect.

"Clearly using email won't be appropriate or possible in every situation and it should be used as a complement to face-to-face care. Security is also absolutely essential and services have the same duty of patient confidentiality as with traditional methods of communication."

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:32am Wed 3 Sep 14

Rita Jelfs says...

E-mailing doctors with a question of health issues has been a useful tool for patients for many years. But with doctors being more overwhelmed by their latest responsibilities from the government, It depends on how e-mailing is used by a doctor. If a doctor is only paid by the NHS is he sees patients face-to-face then there would be no incentive to for him to replace face-to-face with e-mail/Skype consultation. If a doctor was paid for an e-mail/skype consultation, more patients could be 'processed' in an hour, while getting paid the same amount per patient. E-mail allows a doctor to deflect malingering patients more easily, while having a crucial 'checklist' of symptoms that signal urgent attendance at the surgery? Skype enhances provision of critical information with hospitals from a surgery.
E-mailing doctors with a question of health issues has been a useful tool for patients for many years. But with doctors being more overwhelmed by their latest responsibilities from the government, It depends on how e-mailing is used by a doctor. If a doctor is only paid by the NHS is he sees patients face-to-face then there would be no incentive to for him to replace face-to-face with e-mail/Skype consultation. If a doctor was paid for an e-mail/skype consultation, more patients could be 'processed' in an hour, while getting paid the same amount per patient. E-mail allows a doctor to deflect malingering patients more easily, while having a crucial 'checklist' of symptoms that signal urgent attendance at the surgery? Skype enhances provision of critical information with hospitals from a surgery. Rita Jelfs
  • Score: -1
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree