PMQs 'shows what No vote means'

John Swinney said PMQs was a stark reminder of what a No vote would mean

John Swinney said PMQs was a stark reminder of what a No vote would mean

First published in National Sport © by

Prime Minister's Questions is a reminder to Scots that they are being governed by "Tory-led governments people in Scotland don't vote for", according to Scottish Finance Secretary John Swinney.

With the penultimate PMQs before the referendum taking place today, Mr Swinney said independence would switch hundreds of millions of pounds of spending from Westminster priorities to Scottish needs.

"The sight of Prime Ministers Questions in the House of Commons is a stark reminder of what a No vote means - Tory-led governments people in Scotland don't vote for, imposing policies we don't support and charging us for the privilege," he said.

"A Yes vote means the opportunity to control economic and tax policy so that many more people in Scotland benefit from our wealth and vast natural resources.

"That's why we're better off with Scotland's future in Scotland's hands."

He added: "Scotland is one of the richest countries in the world, wealthier per head than France, the UK and Japan.

"We have generated more tax than the UK for every one of the last 33 years and people in Scotland will always spend our money much better than Tory Chancellors like George Osborne.

"More and more people are waking up to the opportunities of independence, such as controlling our own budget, so that we can spend our taxes on policies that benefit many more people in Scotland.

"The current Scottish Government has identified savings of around £600 million a year by taking different decisions from Westminster.

"By getting rid of Westminster politicians we can save nearly £50 million alone. To put that in perspective that's around the same amount of money needed to mitigate the costs of Westminster's bedroom tax, which has penalised thousands of disabled and other people.

"With independence any future government will have full control of Scotland's finances - so never again will we be forced to fund policies that have been overwhelmingly rejected by people in Scotland.

"That means we won't have to use taxpayers' money to mitigate the impact of the cruel bedroom tax or pay a share of the obscene £100 billion cost of a new generation of nuclear weapons.

"And why are we spending millions on the unelected House of Lords?"

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:28pm Wed 3 Sep 14

Rita Jelfs says...

But will Scotland have full control of the revenues from oil?
But will Scotland have full control of the revenues from oil? Rita Jelfs
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree